Pro-Reproductive Rights

 


 

You know what gets me is that the pro-life right-wing people are really not pro-life at all. People who oppose abortion often call themselves pro-life. However, the only life many of them are concerned with is the life of the fertilized egg, embryo, or fetus. They are much less concerned about the life of women who have unintended pregnancies or the welfare of children after they’re born. In fact, many people who call themselves “pro-life” support capital punishment (AKA the death penalty) and oppose child welfare legislation. That’s right they tend to do everything that is not pro-life especially not giving a shit about the baby after its born or people that need help, Knowing that they have forced a woman to have that child and she is not able to take care of it.

I think when a person says that they are pro-life, that they must support and care for that child that for the rest of their lives, since they are the ones who stopped that abortion. Since in general they are forcing some one to do something that person doesn’t want to do, so these people should be forced to take care of the child no matter what. Among those who deny women's reproductive rights, numerous contradictory positions are observed. For example, some prominent politicians who want to overturn Roe v. Wade would allow exceptions for rape, incest, severe fetal abnormality and/or life of the mother. These exceptions necessarily require destroying the fetus, which is the very action they condemn. In other words, the murder of unborn children is acceptable when anti-abortion politicians approve, and they have no problem with their hypocrisy

The thing is that people who identify as pro-choice believe that everyone has the basic human right to decide when and whether to have children. When you say you’re pro-choice you’re telling people that you believe it’s OK for them to have the ability to choose abortion as an option for an unplanned pregnancy — even if you wouldn’t choose abortion for yourself. Just because your pro-choice doesn’t mean you are for abortion; it means that its not your choice to tell another human being what to do with their body.

The pro-life people are the ones who are always arguing for small government, but yet demand that the government make a regulation or law telling some one what they can do, even though these people are the first to demand that the government stay out of their business and say that the government can’t tell me what to do period. Pro-Life people are nothing but a group of closed-minded hypocrites who want the power over others, so they can feel superior.  Another blatant inconsistency of their hypocrisy involves physicians who want to defund Planned Parenthood because it provides aborted fetuses for medical research. Yet, some of these physicians have themselves conducted research using aborted fetuses. Furthermore, medical investigations using fetal tissue have produced lifesaving vaccines and therapeutic interventions that have benefited everyone.

The reproductive rights advocates need to attack the anti-abortion terrorists with the same ferocity that the zealots for pro-life exhibit in their ongoing campaign of harassment, violence and dishonesty. The truth is that the bible does not endorse the fundamentalist Christian assault on women's reproductive health. 

I myself is pro-choice or pro-reproductive rights, because I don't have a uterus or the ability to get pregnant and not a woman and do not have the right to tell a women what she can do with her body no matter what.

Below are just three examples of many that God of the Abrahamic Religions is Pro-Choice and not Pro-Life like a lot of Hypocritical so called Christians think he is.

• A pregnant woman who is injured and aborts the fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25).

• The gruesome priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit will cause her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31).

• Jesus did not express any special concern for unborn children during the anticipated end times: "Woe to pregnant women and those who are nursing" (Matthew 24:19).

Comments

  1. It's also important to note just exactly who is subject to the US constitution, its laws, and just who said laws protect.
    The answer to the first and second is US citizens. The answer to the second is some visitors of other nationalities, with limitations.

    Now... just what defines a US citizen?
    Well, that would be:
    1) Anyone born within the 50 states, its territories, or born abroad provided at least one parent is a US citizen. Or
    2) if as an adult at least 18 years old who has been a permanent resident for at least 5 years (or 3 years
    if you are married to a U.S. citizen) and meet other eligibility requirements, becomes a Naturalized citizen.

    Fetuses, not meeting either of the above requirements, are not subject to existing constitutional protections of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.
    Nor, as non-citizens or visitors of other nationalities, would they be subject to any future legislative attempts to ensure the be allowed to exist until such time as birth might make them citizens.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts